Key Differences
In short — Xeon E5-2699A v4 outperforms Xeon E5-2630 v3 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon E5-2699A v4 is 778 days newer than Xeon E5-2630 v3.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2699A v4
- Performs up to 6% better in Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege than Xeon E5-2630 v3 - 530 vs 501 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5-2630 v3 - 44 vs 16 threads
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2630 v3
- Consumes up to 41% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2699A v4 - 85 vs 145 Watts
Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Xeon E5-2699A v4
Desktop • Oct 25th, 2016
Xeon E5-2630 v3
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-2699A v4 | vs | Intel Xeon E5-2630 v3 |
|---|---|---|
Oct 25th, 2016 | Release Date | Sep 8th, 2014 |
| Xeon E5 | Collection | Xeon E5 |
| Broadwell | Codename | Haswell |
| Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Desktop | Segment | Server |
22 | Cores | 8 |
44 | Threads | 16 |
| 2.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.4 GHz |
3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
| 145 W | TDP | 85 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
| 24.0x | Multiplier | 24.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | No |
