Key Differences
In short — Xeon E5-2699A v4 outperforms Core i7-5600U on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon E5-2699A v4 is 604 days newer than Core i7-5600U.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2699A v4
- Performs up to 6% better in Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege than Core i7-5600U - 530 vs 498 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-5600U - 44 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i7-5600U
- Consumes up to 90% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2699A v4 - 15 vs 145 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2699A v4 doesn't have integrated graphics
Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Xeon E5-2699A v4
Desktop • Oct 25th, 2016
Core i7-5600U
Mobile • Mar 1st, 2015
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-2699A v4 | vs | Intel Core i7-5600U |
|---|---|---|
Oct 25th, 2016 | Release Date | Mar 1st, 2015 |
| Xeon E5 | Collection | Core i7 |
| Broadwell | Codename | Broadwell |
| Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | Intel BGA 1168 |
Desktop | Segment | Mobile |
22 | Cores | 2 |
44 | Threads | 4 |
| 2.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.6 GHz |
3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
| 145 W | TDP | 15 W |
| 14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 24.0x | Multiplier | 26.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 5500 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
