Key Differences
In short — Athlon 3000G outperforms Xeon E5-2650 v3 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Athlon 3000G is 1899 days newer than Xeon E5-2650 v3.
Advantages of AMD Athlon 3000G
- Performs up to 1% better in Sea of Thieves than Xeon E5-2650 v3 - 221 vs 219 FPS
- Consumes up to 67% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2650 v3 - 35 vs 105 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2650 v3 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2650 v3
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Athlon 3000G - 20 vs 4 threads
Sea of Thieves
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Mythical
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Mythical
Desktop • Nov 20th, 2019
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Athlon 3000G | vs | Intel Xeon E5-2650 v3 |
---|---|---|
Nov 20th, 2019 | Release Date | Sep 8th, 2014 |
Athlon | Collection | Xeon E5 |
Picasso | Codename | Haswell |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Desktop | Segment | Server |
2 | Cores | 10 |
4 | Threads | 20 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.3 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 105 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 23.0x |
Radeon Vega 3 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |