Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 1920X outperforms Xeon E5-2680 v3 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 1920X is 1067 days newer than Xeon E5-2680 v3.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2680 v3
- Consumes up to 33% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X - 120 vs 180 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X
- Performs up to 8% better in Counter-Strike 2 than Xeon E5-2680 v3 - 332 vs 306 FPS
Counter-Strike 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
FPS
332
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.15/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$381.33
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for CA$381.33 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 207 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-2680 v3 | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X |
---|---|---|
Sep 8th, 2014 | Release Date | Aug 10th, 2017 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Haswell | Codename | Whitehaven |
Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
12 | Cores | 12 |
24 | Threads | 24 |
2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
3.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
120 W | TDP | 180 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |