Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10900F outperforms Xeon E5-2670 v3 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-10900F is 2061 days newer than Xeon E5-2670 v3.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900F
- Performs up to 6% better in Valheim than Xeon E5-2670 v3 - 205 vs 194 FPS
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2670 v3 - 65 vs 120 Watts
Valheim
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
205
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.61/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$329.49
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for CA$329.49 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 5200 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-2670 v3 | vs | Intel Core i9-10900F |
---|---|---|
Sep 8th, 2014 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Core i9 |
Gainestown, Haswell-E/EP, Sandy Bridge-EP/EX | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
12 | Cores | 10 |
24 | Threads | 20 |
2.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
3.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
120 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
23.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |