Key Differences
In short — Core i5-13400F outperforms the cheaper Core i9-10900F on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i9-10900F is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-13400F is 979 days newer than the cheaper Core i9-10900F.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900F
- Up to 84% cheaper than Core i5-13400F - CA$358.88 vs CA$2238.3
- Up to 83% better value when playing FINAL FANTASY XIV: Endwalker than Core i5-13400F - CA$1.4 vs CA$8.11 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-13400F - 20 vs 16 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-13400F
- Performs up to 7% better in FINAL FANTASY XIV: Endwalker than Core i9-10900F - 276 vs 257 FPS
FINAL FANTASY XIV: Endwalker
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
257
93%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.4/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$358.88
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$358.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 196 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
276
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$8.11/FPS
17%
Price, CA$
CA$2238.3
16%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$2,238.3 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 196 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-10900F | vs | Intel Core i5-13400F |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
Core i9 | Collection | Core i5 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
10 | Cores | 10 |
20 | Threads | 16 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
5.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.6 GHz |
65 W | TDP | Not Available |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |