Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 2920X outperforms Xeon E5-2660 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 2920X is 2402 days newer than Xeon E5-2660.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2660
- Consumes up to 47% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - 95 vs 180 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X
- Performs up to 23% better in Rust than Xeon E5-2660 - 189 vs 154 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5-2660 - 24 vs 16 threads
Rust
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Oct 3rd, 2018
FPS
189
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$3.84/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$726.1
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for CA$726.1 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 129 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Server/Workstation • Mar 6th, 2012
Desktop • Oct 3rd, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-2660 | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X |
---|---|---|
Mar 6th, 2012 | Release Date | Oct 3rd, 2018 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Sandy Bridge-EP | Codename | Colfax |
Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 12 |
16 | Threads | 24 |
2.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
3.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 180 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
22.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |