Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10900KF outperforms Xeon E5-2620 v2 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-10900KF is 2433 days newer than Xeon E5-2620 v2.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2620 v2
- Consumes up to 36% less energy than Intel Core i9-10900KF - 80 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900KF
- Performs up to 21% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Xeon E5-2620 v2 - 138 vs 114 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5-2620 v2 - 20 vs 12 threads
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
138
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$2.99/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$412.49
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for CA$412.49 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 16765 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Server/Workstation • Sep 1st, 2013
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-2620 v2 | vs | Intel Core i9-10900KF |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Core i9 |
Ivy Bridge EP | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 10 |
12 | Threads | 20 |
2.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
2.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.3 GHz |
80 W | TDP | 125 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
21.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |