Key Differences
In short — Core i9-11900KF outperforms Xeon E5-2620 v2 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-11900KF is 2753 days newer than Xeon E5-2620 v2.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2620 v2
- Consumes up to 36% less energy than Intel Core i9-11900KF - 80 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i9-11900KF
- Performs up to 34% better in Shadow of the Tomb Raider: Definitive Edition than Xeon E5-2620 v2 - 242 vs 181 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5-2620 v2 - 16 vs 12 threads
Shadow of the Tomb Raider: Definitive Edition
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
242
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.51/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$365
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for CA$365 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 18626 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Server/Workstation • Sep 1st, 2013
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-2620 v2 | vs | Intel Core i9-11900KF |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Core i9 |
Ivy Bridge EP | Codename | Rocket Lake |
Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 8 |
12 | Threads | 16 |
2.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
2.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.3 GHz |
80 W | TDP | 125 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
21.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |