Key Differences
In short — Xeon E5-2699A v4 outperforms Xeon E5-2609 v3 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon E5-2699A v4 is 778 days newer than Xeon E5-2609 v3.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2609 v3
- Consumes up to 41% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2699A v4 - 85 vs 145 Watts
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2699A v4
- Performs up to 8% better in A Plague Tale: Requiem than Xeon E5-2609 v3 - 128 vs 119 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5-2609 v3 - 44 vs 6 threads
A Plague Tale: Requiem
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Xeon E5-2609 v3
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Xeon E5-2699A v4
Desktop • Oct 25th, 2016
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-2609 v3 | vs | Intel Xeon E5-2699A v4 |
|---|---|---|
| Sep 8th, 2014 | Release Date | Oct 25th, 2016 |
| Xeon E5 | Collection | Xeon E5 |
| Haswell-E/EP, Sandy Bridge-EP/EX | Codename | Broadwell |
| Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
| 6 | Cores | 22 |
| 6 | Threads | 44 |
| 1.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.4 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
85 W | TDP | 145 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 19.0x | Multiplier | 24.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | No |
