Buy on Amazon
CA$36.89
In Stock
Availability
Availability
No items available
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Celeron G1620 outperforms Xeon E5-2420 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Celeron G1620 is 203 days newer than Xeon E5-2420.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2420
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1620 - 12 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1620
- Performs up to 3% better in FIFA 23 than Xeon E5-2420 - 91 vs 88 FPS
- Consumes up to 42% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2420 - 55 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2420 doesn't have integrated graphics
FIFA 23
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Celeron G1620
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
FPS
91
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.41/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$36.89
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Intel Celeron G1620 CPU Used 2-Core 2-Thread Desktop Processor 2.7 GHz 2M 55W LGA1155
Buy for CA$36.89 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 118 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Xeon E5-2420
Server/Workstation • May 14th, 2012
Celeron G1620
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-2420 | vs | Intel Celeron G1620 |
|---|---|---|
| May 14th, 2012 | Release Date | Dec 3rd, 2012 |
| Xeon E5 | Collection | Celeron |
| Sandy Bridge-EN | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
| Intel Socket 1356 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 2 |
12 | Threads | 2 |
| 1.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.7 GHz |
| 2.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
| 95 W | TDP | 55 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
| 19.0x | Multiplier | 27.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD |
| No | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
