Key Differences
In short — FX-8350 outperforms Xeon E5-2420 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing FX-8350 is 162 days newer than Xeon E5-2420.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2420
- Consumes up to 24% less energy than AMD FX-8350 - 95 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of AMD FX-8350
- Performs up to 1% better in Fortnite than Xeon E5-2420 - 213 vs 211 FPS
Fortnite
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
FPS
213
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.86/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$182.45
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for CA$182.45 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 69 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Server/Workstation • May 14th, 2012
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-2420 | vs | AMD FX-8350 |
---|---|---|
May 14th, 2012 | Release Date | Oct 23rd, 2012 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | FX |
Sandy Bridge-EN | Codename | Vishera |
Intel Socket 1356 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 8 |
12 | Threads | 8 |
1.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
2.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 125 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
19.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |