Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 2920X outperforms Xeon E5-1680 v2 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 2920X is 1849 days newer than Xeon E5-1680 v2.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-1680 v2
- Consumes up to 28% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - 130 vs 180 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X
- Performs up to 3% better in Battlefield 1 than Xeon E5-1680 v2 - 240 vs 232 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5-1680 v2 - 24 vs 16 threads
Battlefield 1
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 3rd, 2018
FPS
240
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$3.03/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$726.1
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for CA$726.1 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 207 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Server/Workstation • Sep 10th, 2013
Desktop • Oct 3rd, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-1680 v2 | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X |
---|---|---|
Sep 10th, 2013 | Release Date | Oct 3rd, 2018 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Colfax |
Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 12 |
16 | Threads | 24 |
3.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
130 W | TDP | 180 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
30.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |