Buy on Amazon
CA$32.99
In Stock
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $621
Availability
MSRP in USD: $621
No items available
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Xeon E5-1650 v4 outperforms Celeron G1620 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon E5-1650 v4 is 1295 days newer than Celeron G1620.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-1650 v4
- Performs up to 16% better in World of Warcraft than Celeron G1620 - 177 vs 153 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1620 - 12 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1620
- Consumes up to 61% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-1650 v4 - 55 vs 140 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-1650 v4 doesn't have integrated graphics
World of Warcraft
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Celeron G1620
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
FPS
153
86.4406779661017%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.22/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$32.99
100%
Value Winner
Intel Celeron G1620 CPU Used 2-Core 2-Thread Desktop Processor 2.7 GHz 2M 55W LGA1155
Buy for CA$32.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 83 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Xeon E5-1650 v4
Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016
Celeron G1620
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Celeron G1620
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Single-Core
409
34.66101694915254%
Multi-Core
723
13.193430656934307%
Intel Xeon E5-1650 v4 | vs | Intel Celeron G1620 |
|---|---|---|
Jun 20th, 2016 | Release Date | Dec 3rd, 2012 |
| Xeon E5 | Collection | Celeron |
| Broadwell-E/EP | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
| Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 2 |
12 | Threads | 2 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.7 GHz |
| 4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
| 140 W | TDP | 55 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 27.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD |
| No | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
