Key Differences
In short — Core i9-12900F outperforms Xeon E5-1620 v4 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-12900F is 2024 days newer than Xeon E5-1620 v4.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-12900F
- Performs up to 22% better in Lost Ark than Xeon E5-1620 v4 - 298 vs 245 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4 - 24 vs 8 threads
Lost Ark
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
FPS
298
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$2.18/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$650.21
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for CA$650.21 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 4151 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016
Single-Core
1088
42.85151634501773%
Multi-Core
3898
28.06335493160547%
Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4 | vs | Intel Core i9-12900F |
---|---|---|
Jun 20th, 2016 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2022 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Core i9 |
Broadwell-E/EP | Codename | Alder Lake |
Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 16 |
8 | Threads | 24 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.4 GHz |
3.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.1 GHz |
140 W | TDP | Not Available |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 24.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |