Buy on Amazon
CA$600
In Stock
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $294
Availability
MSRP in USD: $294
No items available
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $499
Availability
MSRP in USD: $499
Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 3900XT outperforms Xeon E5-1620 v4 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 9 3900XT is 1478 days newer than Xeon E5-1620 v4.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT
- Performs up to 3% better in Battlefield 1 than Xeon E5-1620 v4 - 246 vs 238 FPS
- Consumes up to 25% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4 - 105 vs 140 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4 - 24 vs 8 threads
Battlefield 1
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT 12-core, 24-thread unlocked desktop processor without cooler
Buy for CA$600 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 77127 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Xeon E5-1620 v4
Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016
Ryzen 9 3900XT
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Xeon E5-1620 v4
Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016
Single-Core
1088
62.92654713707345%
Multi-Core
3898
38.86340977068794%
Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4 | vs | AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT |
|---|---|---|
| Jun 20th, 2016 | Release Date | Jul 7th, 2020 |
| Xeon E5 | Collection | Ryzen 9 |
| Broadwell-E/EP | Codename | Matisse |
| Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 4 | Cores | 12 |
| 8 | Threads | 24 |
| 3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
| 3.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.7 GHz |
| 140 W | TDP | 105 W |
| 14 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
| 35.0x | Multiplier | 39.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
