Key Differences
In short — Xeon E5-1620 v4 outperforms Ryzen 3 1200 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon E5-1620 v4 is 402 days older than Ryzen 3 1200.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4
- Performs up to 1% better in Battlefield IV than Ryzen 3 1200 - 400 vs 395 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 3 1200 - 8 vs 4 threads
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 3 1200
- Consumes up to 54% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4 - 65 vs 140 Watts
Battlefield IV
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jul 27th, 2017
FPS
395
98.75%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.39/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$549.99
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$549.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 4144 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016
Desktop • Jul 27th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jul 27th, 2017
Single-Core
984
90.44117647058823%
Multi-Core
2834
72.70395074397126%
Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4 | vs | AMD Ryzen 3 1200 |
---|---|---|
Jun 20th, 2016 | Release Date | Jul 27th, 2017 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Ryzen 3 |
Broadwell-E/EP | Codename | Summit Ridge |
Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 4 |
8 | Threads | 4 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
3.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
140 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 31.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |