Key Differences
In short — Core i9-12900F outperforms the cheaper Core i9-10900F on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i9-10900F is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-12900F is 614 days newer than the cheaper Core i9-10900F.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-12900F
- Performs up to 4% better in The Outer Worlds than Core i9-10900F - 216 vs 207 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i9-10900F - 24 vs 20 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900F
- Up to 51% cheaper than Core i9-12900F - CA$388.0 vs CA$792.34
- Up to 49% better value when playing The Outer Worlds than Core i9-12900F - CA$1.87 vs CA$3.67 per FPS
The Outer Worlds
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
FPS
216
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$3.67/FPS
50%
Price, CA$
CA$792.34
48%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$792.34 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 5 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
207
95%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.87/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$388
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$388 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 6 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-12900F | vs | Intel Core i9-10900F |
---|---|---|
Jan 4th, 2022 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Core i9 | Collection | Core i9 |
Alder Lake | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
16 | Cores | 10 |
24 | Threads | 20 |
2.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
5.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
Not Available | TDP | 65 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
24.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |