Buy on Amazon
CA$158.07
In Stock
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $294
Availability
MSRP in USD: $294
No items available
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $299
Availability
MSRP in USD: $299
Key Differences
In short — Xeon E5-1620 v4 outperforms Ryzen 7 2700 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon E5-1620 v4 is 668 days older than Ryzen 7 2700.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 7 2700
- Consumes up to 54% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4 - 65 vs 140 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4 - 16 vs 8 threads
Total War: WARHAMMER III
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
CPU Processor AMD Ryzen 7 2700 R7 2700 3.2 GHz Eight-Core Sixteen-Thread 16M 65W CPU Processor Socket AM4 YD2700BBM88AF
Buy for CA$158.07 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 77390 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Xeon E5-1620 v4
Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016
Ryzen 7 2700
Desktop • Apr 19th, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Xeon E5-1620 v4
Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016
Single-Core
1088
97.66606822262118%
Multi-Core
3898
71.01475678629987%
Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4 | vs | AMD Ryzen 7 2700 |
|---|---|---|
| Jun 20th, 2016 | Release Date | Apr 19th, 2018 |
| Xeon E5 | Collection | Ryzen 7 |
| Broadwell-E/EP | Codename | Pinnacle Ridge |
| Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 4 | Cores | 8 |
| 8 | Threads | 16 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
| 3.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.1 GHz |
| 140 W | TDP | 65 W |
| 14 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
