Key Differences
In short — Core i7-13700K outperforms Xeon E5-1620 v3 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-13700K is 2941 days newer than Xeon E5-1620 v3.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-13700K
- Performs up to 32% better in Minecraft than Xeon E5-1620 v3 - 882 vs 668 FPS
- Consumes up to 11% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-1620 v3 - 125 vs 140 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5-1620 v3 - 24 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-1620 v3 doesn't have integrated graphics
Minecraft
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Xeon E5-1620 v3
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Core i7-13700K
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-1620 v3 | vs | Intel Core i7-13700K |
|---|---|---|
| Sep 8th, 2014 | Release Date | Sep 27th, 2022 |
| Xeon E5 | Collection | Core i7 |
| Haswell-E/EP | Codename | Raptor Lake |
| Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
| 4 | Cores | 16 |
| 8 | Threads | 24 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
| 3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.4 GHz |
| 140 W | TDP | 125 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
