Key Differences
In short — Core i3-12100F outperforms Xeon E5-1620 v3 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-12100F is 2696 days newer than Xeon E5-1620 v3.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-12100F
- Performs up to 7% better in F1 22 than Xeon E5-1620 v3 - 286 vs 268 FPS
- Consumes up to 59% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-1620 v3 - 58 vs 140 Watts
F1 22
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Buy for CA$102.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 65467 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Desktop • Jan 25th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Single-Core
1078
48.449438202247194%
Multi-Core
3819
51.21362478208395%
Intel Xeon E5-1620 v3 | vs | Intel Core i3-12100F |
---|---|---|
Sep 8th, 2014 | Release Date | Jan 25th, 2022 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Core i3 |
Haswell-E/EP | Codename | Alder Lake |
Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 4 |
8 | Threads | 8 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
140 W | TDP | 58 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 33.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |