Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 7 7700X outperforms Xeon E5-1620 v3 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 7 7700X is 2941 days newer than Xeon E5-1620 v3.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 7 7700X
- Performs up to 35% better in World of Warcraft than Xeon E5-1620 v3 - 233 vs 173 FPS
- Consumes up to 25% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-1620 v3 - 105 vs 140 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5-1620 v3 - 16 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-1620 v3 doesn't have integrated graphics
World of Warcraft
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
FPS
233
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.88/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$439
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for CA$439 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 53 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-1620 v3 | vs | AMD Ryzen 7 7700X |
---|---|---|
Sep 8th, 2014 | Release Date | Sep 27th, 2022 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Ryzen 7 |
Haswell-E/EP | Codename | Raphael |
Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | AMD Socket AM5 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 8 |
8 | Threads | 16 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.5 GHz |
3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.4 GHz |
140 W | TDP | 105 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 5 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 45.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Graphics |
No | Overclockable | Yes |