Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 5500 outperforms Xeon E5-1620 v3 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 5 5500 is 2765 days newer than Xeon E5-1620 v3.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 5500
- Performs up to 12% better in Battlefield V than Xeon E5-1620 v3 - 255 vs 228 FPS
- Consumes up to 54% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-1620 v3 - 65 vs 140 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5-1620 v3 - 12 vs 8 threads
Battlefield V
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for CA$108 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 65469 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Desktop • Apr 4th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Single-Core
1078
57.616247995724216%
Multi-Core
3819
49.64898595943838%
Intel Xeon E5-1620 v3 | vs | AMD Ryzen 5 5500 |
---|---|---|
Sep 8th, 2014 | Release Date | Apr 4th, 2022 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
Haswell-E/EP | Codename | Vermeer |
Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 6 |
8 | Threads | 12 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
140 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |