Key Differences
In short — Xeon E3-1275 v3 outperforms Ryzen Threadripper 1950X on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon E3-1275 v3 is 1530 days older than Ryzen Threadripper 1950X.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E3-1275 v3
- Performs up to 2% better in HITMAN 2 than Ryzen Threadripper 1950X - 136 vs 133 FPS
- Consumes up to 53% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X - 84 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E3-1275 v3 - 32 vs 8 threads
HITMAN 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
FPS
133
97%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$6.02/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$800.03
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$800.03 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 151 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Server/Workstation • Jun 2nd, 2013
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E3-1275 v3 | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X |
---|---|---|
Jun 2nd, 2013 | Release Date | Aug 10th, 2017 |
Xeon E3 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Haswell | Codename | Whitehaven |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 16 |
8 | Threads | 32 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
84 W | TDP | 180 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
Intel HD P4600 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |