Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 1920X outperforms Xeon E3-1270 v3 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 1920X is 1530 days newer than Xeon E3-1270 v3.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E3-1270 v3
- Consumes up to 56% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X - 80 vs 180 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X
- Performs up to 1% better in Apex Legends than Xeon E3-1270 v3 - 278 vs 274 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E3-1270 v3 - 24 vs 8 threads
Apex Legends
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
FPS
278
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.33/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$369.9
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for CA$369.9 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 173 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Server/Workstation • Jun 2nd, 2013
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E3-1270 v3 | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X |
---|---|---|
Jun 2nd, 2013 | Release Date | Aug 10th, 2017 |
Xeon E3 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Haswell | Codename | Whitehaven |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 12 |
8 | Threads | 24 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
80 W | TDP | 180 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |