Key Differences
In short — FX-8350 outperforms Xeon E3-1260L on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing FX-8350 is 569 days newer than Xeon E3-1260L.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E3-1260L
- Consumes up to 64% less energy than AMD FX-8350 - 45 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-8350 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD FX-8350
- Performs up to 0% better in F1 22 than Xeon E3-1260L - 253 vs 252 FPS
F1 22
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
FPS
253
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.72/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$182.45
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for CA$182.45 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 16164 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Server/Workstation • Apr 3rd, 2011
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E3-1260L | vs | AMD FX-8350 |
---|---|---|
Apr 3rd, 2011 | Release Date | Oct 23rd, 2012 |
Xeon E3 | Collection | FX |
Sandy Bridge | Codename | Vishera |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 8 |
8 | Threads | 8 |
2.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
3.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
45 W | TDP | 125 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
24.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
Intel HD 2000 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |