Key Differences
In short — Core i5-11400F outperforms Xeon E3-1260L on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-11400F is 3635 days newer than Xeon E3-1260L.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E3-1260L
- Consumes up to 31% less energy than Intel Core i5-11400F - 45 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-11400F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11400F
- Performs up to 27% better in Shadow of the Tomb Raider: Definitive Edition than Xeon E3-1260L - 227 vs 179 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E3-1260L - 12 vs 8 threads
Shadow of the Tomb Raider: Definitive Edition
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
227
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.86/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$196.21
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for CA$196.21 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 98 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Server/Workstation • Apr 3rd, 2011
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E3-1260L | vs | Intel Core i5-11400F |
---|---|---|
Apr 3rd, 2011 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
Xeon E3 | Collection | Core i5 |
Sandy Bridge | Codename | Rocket Lake |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 6 |
8 | Threads | 12 |
2.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.6 GHz |
3.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
45 W | TDP | 65 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
24.0x | Multiplier | 26.0x |
Intel HD 2000 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |