Buy on Amazon
CA$80.8
In Stock
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $87
Availability
MSRP in USD: $87
No items available
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — FX-6100 outperforms Pentium G6950 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing FX-6100 is 643 days newer than Pentium G6950.
Advantages of Intel Pentium G6950
- Consumes up to 23% less energy than AMD FX-6100 - 73 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-6100 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD FX-6100
- Performs up to 2% better in Shadow of the Tomb Raider: Definitive Edition than Pentium G6950 - 176 vs 172 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Pentium G6950 - 6 vs 2 threads
Shadow of the Tomb Raider: Definitive Edition
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
AMD FX-Series FX-6100 FX6100 Desktop CPU Socket AM3 938 FD6100WMW6KGU FD6100WMGUSBX
Buy for CA$80.8 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 74970 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Pentium G6950
Desktop • Jan 7th, 2010
FX-6100
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Pentium G6950
Desktop • Jan 7th, 2010
Single-Core
324
85.03937007874016%
Multi-Core
517
42.23856209150327%
Intel Pentium G6950 | vs | AMD FX-6100 |
|---|---|---|
| Jan 7th, 2010 | Release Date | Oct 12th, 2011 |
| Pentium | Collection | FX |
| Clarkdale | Codename | Zambezi |
| Intel Socket 1156 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 6 |
| 2 | Threads | 6 |
| 2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
73 W | TDP | 95 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
21.0x | Multiplier | 16.5x |
Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
