Buy on Amazon
CA$112
In Stock
Availability
Availability
No items available
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $353
Availability
MSRP in USD: $353
Key Differences
In short — Pentium G4600 outperforms Core i7-875K on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Pentium G4600 is 2410 days newer than Core i7-875K.
Advantages of Intel Pentium G4600
- Performs up to 4% better in Total War: WARHAMMER III than Core i7-875K - 158 vs 152 FPS
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than Intel Core i7-875K - 51 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-875K doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i7-875K
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Pentium G4600 - 8 vs 4 threads
Total War: WARHAMMER III
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Core i7-875K
Desktop • May 30th, 2010
FPS
152
96%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.74/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$112
100%
Value Winner
Intel Core I7-875K I7 875K I7 875 2.933 GHz Used Quad-Core Eight-Thread CPU Processor LGA 1156
Buy for CA$112 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 61 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Pentium G4600
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Core i7-875K
Desktop • May 30th, 2010
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Pentium G4600 | vs | Intel Core i7-875K |
|---|---|---|
Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | May 30th, 2010 |
| Pentium | Collection | Core i7 |
| Kaby Lake | Codename | Lynnfield |
| Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1156 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 4 |
| 4 | Threads | 8 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
51 W | TDP | 95 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 45 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 22.0x |
Intel HD 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
