Key Differences
In short — Pentium G2010 outperforms Celeron G1620 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Pentium G2010 is 49 days newer than Celeron G1620.
Advantages of Intel Pentium G2010
- Performs up to 1% better in Total War: WARHAMMER III than Celeron G1620 - 151 vs 150 FPS
Total War: WARHAMMER III
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
FPS
150
99%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.25/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$36.89
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$36.89 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 38 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 21st, 2013
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Pentium G2010 | vs | Intel Celeron G1620 |
---|---|---|
Jan 21st, 2013 | Release Date | Dec 3rd, 2012 |
Pentium | Collection | Celeron |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 2 |
2 | Threads | 2 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.7 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
55 W | TDP | 55 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 27.0x |
Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD |
No | Overclockable | No |