Buy on Amazon
CA$1,300
In Stock
Availability
Availability
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $299
Availability
MSRP in USD: $299
Key Differences
In short — Core i9-9900X outperforms the cheaper Ryzen 7 2700 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Ryzen 7 2700 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-9900X is 183 days newer than the cheaper Ryzen 7 2700.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-9900X
- Performs up to 6% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Ryzen 7 2700 - 133 vs 126 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 7 2700 - 20 vs 16 threads
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 7 2700
- Up to 78% cheaper than Core i9-9900X - CA$280.0 vs CA$1300.0
- Up to 77% better value when playing Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Core i9-9900X - CA$2.22 vs CA$9.77 per FPS
- Consumes up to 61% less energy than Intel Core i9-9900X - 65 vs 165 Watts
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Core i9-9900X
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
FPS
133
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$9.77/FPS
22%
Price, CA$
CA$1300
21%
FPS Winner
Intel Core i9-9900X 3.5 Ghz Ten-Core Lga 2066 Processor 3.5 10 BX80673I99900X
Buy for CA$1,300 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 64 minutes ago
Ryzen 7 2700
Desktop • Apr 19th, 2018
FPS
126
94%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$2.22/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$280
100%
Value Winner
AMD Ryzen 7 2700 Processor with Wraith Spire LED Cooler - YD2700BBAFBOX
Buy for CA$280 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 64 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Core i9-9900X
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
Ryzen 7 2700
Desktop • Apr 19th, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-9900X | vs | AMD Ryzen 7 2700 |
|---|---|---|
Oct 19th, 2018 | Release Date | Apr 19th, 2018 |
| Core i9 | Collection | Ryzen 7 |
| Skylake | Codename | Pinnacle Ridge |
| Intel Socket 2066 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
10 | Cores | 8 |
20 | Threads | 16 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
4.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.1 GHz |
| 165 W | TDP | 65 W |
| 14 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | None |
| Yes | Overclockable | Yes |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
