Key Differences
In short — Core i9-9900X outperforms the cheaper Core i5-9400F on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-9400F is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-9900X is 81 days older than the cheaper Core i5-9400F.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-9900X
- Performs up to 3% better in Rust than Core i5-9400F - 199 vs 194 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-9400F - 20 vs 6 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-9400F
- Up to 80% cheaper than Core i9-9900X - CA$153.19 vs CA$774.0
- Up to 80% better value when playing Rust than Core i9-9900X - CA$0.79 vs CA$3.89 per FPS
- Consumes up to 61% less energy than Intel Core i9-9900X - 65 vs 165 Watts
Rust
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
FPS
199
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$3.89/FPS
20%
Price, CA$
CA$774
19%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$774 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 108 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2019
FPS
194
97%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.79/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$153.19
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$153.19 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 108 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-9900X | vs | Intel Core i5-9400F |
---|---|---|
Oct 19th, 2018 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2019 |
Core i9 | Collection | Core i5 |
Skylake | Codename | Coffee Lake |
Intel Socket 2066 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
10 | Cores | 6 |
20 | Threads | 6 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
4.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.1 GHz |
165 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |