Key Differences
In short — Core i9-9900T outperforms FX-8150 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-9900T is 2750 days newer than FX-8150.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-9900T
- Performs up to 2% better in Crysis 3 Remastered than FX-8150 - 182 vs 178 FPS
- Consumes up to 72% less energy than AMD FX-8150 - 35 vs 125 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-8150 - 16 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-8150 doesn't have integrated graphics
Crysis 3 Remastered
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Buy for CA$93.19 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 298 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-9900T | vs | AMD FX-8150 |
---|---|---|
Apr 23rd, 2019 | Release Date | Oct 12th, 2011 |
Core i9 | Collection | FX |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Zambezi |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 8 |
16 | Threads | 8 |
2.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
4.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
21.0x | Multiplier | 18.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |