Key Differences
In short — Core i9-9900KS outperforms the cheaper FX-6100 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-9900KS is 2938 days newer than the cheaper FX-6100.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-9900KS
- Performs up to 9% better in The Last of Us Part I than FX-6100 - 139 vs 127 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-6100 - 16 vs 6 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-6100 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD FX-6100
- Up to 99% cheaper than Core i9-9900KS - CA$83.57 vs CA$9019.53
- Consumes up to 25% less energy than Intel Core i9-9900KS - 95 vs 127 Watts
The Last of Us Part I
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for CA$9,019.53 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 110 minutes ago
Buy for CA$83.57 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 110 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 28th, 2019
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-9900KS | vs | AMD FX-6100 |
---|---|---|
Oct 28th, 2019 | Release Date | Oct 12th, 2011 |
Core i9 | Collection | FX |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Zambezi |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 6 |
16 | Threads | 6 |
4.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
5.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
127 W | TDP | 95 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
40.0x | Multiplier | 16.5x |
UHD 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |