Key Differences
In short — Core i9-9900K outperforms the cheaper Core i5-7400T on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-7400T is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-9900K is 654 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-7400T.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-9900K
- Performs up to 11% better in Minecraft than Core i5-7400T - 736 vs 662 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-7400T - 16 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-7400T
- Up to 62% cheaper than Core i9-9900K - CA$250.0 vs CA$659.0
- Up to 58% better value when playing Minecraft than Core i9-9900K - CA$0.38 vs CA$0.9 per FPS
- Consumes up to 63% less energy than Intel Core i9-9900K - 35 vs 95 Watts
Minecraft
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
FPS
736
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.9/FPS
42%
Price, CA$
CA$659
37%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$659 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 1176 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FPS
662
89%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.38/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$250
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$250 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 1177 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-9900K | vs | Intel Core i5-7400T |
---|---|---|
Oct 19th, 2018 | Release Date | Jan 3rd, 2017 |
Core i9 | Collection | Core i5 |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Kaby Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 4 |
16 | Threads | 4 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.4 GHz |
5.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 35 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 24.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | HD 630 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |