Key Differences
In short — Core i9-12900F outperforms the cheaper Core i5-7400T on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-7400T is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-12900F is 1827 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-7400T.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-7400T
- Up to 67% cheaper than Core i9-12900F - CA$250.0 vs CA$760.67
- Up to 55% better value when playing Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege than Core i9-12900F - CA$0.49 vs CA$1.08 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-12900F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i9-12900F
- Performs up to 38% better in Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege than Core i5-7400T - 706 vs 511 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-7400T - 24 vs 4 threads
Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FPS
511
72%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.49/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$250
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$250 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 67 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
FPS
706
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.08/FPS
45%
Price, CA$
CA$760.67
32%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$760.67 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 66 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-7400T | vs | Intel Core i9-12900F |
---|---|---|
Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2022 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i9 |
Kaby Lake | Codename | Alder Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 16 |
4 | Threads | 24 |
2.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.4 GHz |
3.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.1 GHz |
35 W | TDP | Not Available |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
24.0x | Multiplier | 24.0x |
HD 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |