Buy on Amazon
CA$250
In Stock
Availability
Availability
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $749
Availability
MSRP in USD: $749
Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 3950X outperforms the cheaper Core i5-7400T on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-7400T is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 9 3950X is 1056 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-7400T.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-7400T
- Up to 76% cheaper than Ryzen 9 3950X - CA$250.0 vs CA$1022.57
- Up to 73% better value when playing Alan Wake 2 than Ryzen 9 3950X - CA$2.34 vs CA$8.67 per FPS
- Consumes up to 67% less energy than AMD Ryzen 9 3950X - 35 vs 105 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 9 3950X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 9 3950X
- Performs up to 10% better in Alan Wake 2 than Core i5-7400T - 118 vs 107 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-7400T - 32 vs 4 threads
Alan Wake 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Core i5-7400T
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FPS
107
90%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$2.34/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$250
100%
Value Winner
Intel BX80677I57400T 7th Generation Intel Core i5-7400T Processor
Buy for CA$250 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 37 minutes ago
Ryzen 9 3950X
Desktop • Nov 25th, 2019
FPS
118
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$8.67/FPS
26%
Price, CA$
CA$1022.57
24%
FPS Winner
AMD Ryzen 9 3950X 16-core, 32-Thread Unlocked Desktop Processor, without Cooler
Buy for CA$1,022.57 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 40 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Core i5-7400T
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Ryzen 9 3950X
Desktop • Nov 25th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-7400T | vs | AMD Ryzen 9 3950X |
|---|---|---|
| Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Nov 25th, 2019 |
| Core i5 | Collection | Ryzen 9 |
| Kaby Lake | Codename | Matisse |
| Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 4 | Cores | 16 |
| 4 | Threads | 32 |
| 2.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
| 3.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.7 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 105 W |
| 14 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
| 24.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
HD 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
