Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900F outperforms the cheaper Core i5-7400T on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-7400T is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-13900F is 2192 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-7400T.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-7400T
- Up to 63% cheaper than Core i9-13900F - CA$250.0 vs CA$669.59
- Up to 60% better value when playing Red Dead Redemption 2 than Core i9-13900F - CA$1.61 vs CA$4.01 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-13900F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i9-13900F
- Performs up to 8% better in Red Dead Redemption 2 than Core i5-7400T - 167 vs 155 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-7400T - 32 vs 4 threads
Red Dead Redemption 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FPS
155
92%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.61/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$250
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$250 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 71 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
167
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$4.01/FPS
40%
Price, CA$
CA$669.59
37%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$669.59 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 70 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-7400T | vs | Intel Core i9-13900F |
---|---|---|
Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i9 |
Kaby Lake | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 24 |
4 | Threads | 32 |
2.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.0 GHz |
3.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.6 GHz |
35 W | TDP | Not Available |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
24.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
HD 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |