Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10900K outperforms the cheaper Core i5-7400T on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-7400T is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-10900K is 1213 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-7400T.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-7400T
- Up to 64% cheaper than Core i9-10900K - CA$250.0 vs CA$699.84
- Up to 59% better value when playing Shadow of the Tomb Raider: Definitive Edition than Core i9-10900K - CA$1.3 vs CA$3.14 per FPS
- Consumes up to 72% less energy than Intel Core i9-10900K - 35 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900K
- Performs up to 16% better in Shadow of the Tomb Raider: Definitive Edition than Core i5-7400T - 223 vs 192 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-7400T - 20 vs 4 threads
Shadow of the Tomb Raider: Definitive Edition
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FPS
192
86%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.3/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$250
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$250 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 25 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
223
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$3.14/FPS
41%
Price, CA$
CA$699.84
35%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$699.84 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 24 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-7400T | vs | Intel Core i9-10900K |
---|---|---|
Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i9 |
Kaby Lake | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 10 |
4 | Threads | 20 |
2.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
3.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.3 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
24.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
HD 630 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |