Key Differences
In short — Core i9-9900K outperforms the cheaper FX-8370 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-8370 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-9900K is 1508 days newer than the cheaper FX-8370.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-9900K
- Performs up to 9% better in Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II than FX-8370 - 209 vs 191 FPS
- Consumes up to 24% less energy than AMD FX-8370 - 95 vs 125 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-8370 - 16 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-8370 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD FX-8370
- Up to 57% cheaper than Core i9-9900K - CA$220.0 vs CA$507.62
- Up to 53% better value when playing Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II than Core i9-9900K - CA$1.15 vs CA$2.43 per FPS
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
FPS
209
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$2.43/FPS
47%
Price, CA$
CA$507.62
43%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$507.62 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 51 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 2nd, 2014
FPS
191
91%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.15/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$220
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$220 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 51 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
Desktop • Sep 2nd, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-9900K | vs | AMD FX-8370 |
---|---|---|
Oct 19th, 2018 | Release Date | Sep 2nd, 2014 |
Core i9 | Collection | FX |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Vishera |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 8 |
16 | Threads | 8 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
5.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |