Key Differences
In short — Core i9-9900 outperforms the cheaper FX-8150 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-9900 is 2750 days newer than the cheaper FX-8150.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-9900
- Performs up to 7% better in Red Dead Redemption 2 than FX-8150 - 160 vs 149 FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than AMD FX-8150 - 65 vs 125 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-8150 - 16 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-8150 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD FX-8150
- Up to 86% cheaper than Core i9-9900 - CA$93.19 vs CA$688.88
Red Dead Redemption 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Buy for CA$688.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 19 minutes ago
Buy for CA$93.19 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 18 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-9900 | vs | AMD FX-8150 |
---|---|---|
Apr 23rd, 2019 | Release Date | Oct 12th, 2011 |
Core i9 | Collection | FX |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Zambezi |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 8 |
16 | Threads | 8 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
5.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
31.0x | Multiplier | 18.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |