Buy on Amazon
CA$32.99
In Stock
Availability
Availability
No items available
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Core i9-7980XE outperforms Celeron G1620 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-7980XE is 1733 days newer than Celeron G1620.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-7980XE
- Performs up to 13% better in No Man's Sky than Celeron G1620 - 177 vs 156 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1620 - 36 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1620
- Consumes up to 67% less energy than Intel Core i9-7980XE - 55 vs 165 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-7980XE doesn't have integrated graphics
No Man's Sky
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Intel Celeron G1620 CPU Used 2-Core 2-Thread Desktop Processor 2.7 GHz 2M 55W LGA1155
Buy for CA$32.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 77392 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Core i9-7980XE
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2017
Celeron G1620
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Celeron G1620
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Single-Core
409
27.357859531772576%
Multi-Core
723
6.224173553719008%
Intel Core i9-7980XE | vs | Intel Celeron G1620 |
|---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2017 | Release Date | Dec 3rd, 2012 |
| Core i9 Extreme | Collection | Celeron |
| Skylake | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
| Intel Socket 2066 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
18 | Cores | 2 |
36 | Threads | 2 |
| 2.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.7 GHz |
| 4.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
| 165 W | TDP | 55 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
| 26.0x | Multiplier | 27.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD |
Yes | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
