Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i9-10900F outperforms the more expensive Core i9-7920X on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i9-10900F is 963 days newer than the more expensive Core i9-7920X.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-7920X
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i9-10900F - 24 vs 20 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900F
- Performs up to 3% better in DOOM Eternal than Core i9-7920X - 500 vs 486 FPS
- Up to 35% cheaper than Core i9-7920X - CA$388.0 vs CA$600.75
- Up to 37% better value when playing DOOM Eternal than Core i9-7920X - CA$0.78 vs CA$1.24 per FPS
- Consumes up to 54% less energy than Intel Core i9-7920X - 65 vs 140 Watts
DOOM Eternal
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Nightmare
Buy for CA$600.75 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 15549 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
500
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.78/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$388
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for CA$388 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 15548 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Nightmare
Desktop • Sep 10th, 2017
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-7920X | vs | Intel Core i9-10900F |
---|---|---|
Sep 10th, 2017 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Core i9 | Collection | Core i9 |
Skylake | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 2066 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
12 | Cores | 10 |
24 | Threads | 20 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
4.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
140 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |