Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i3-8350K outperforms the more expensive Core i9-7920X on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i3-8350K is 25 days newer than the more expensive Core i9-7920X.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-7920X
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-8350K - 24 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-8350K
- Performs up to 1% better in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt than Core i9-7920X - 168 vs 167 FPS
- Up to 47% cheaper than Core i9-7920X - CA$318.88 vs CA$600.75
- Up to 47% better value when playing The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt than Core i9-7920X - CA$1.9 vs CA$3.6 per FPS
- Consumes up to 35% less energy than Intel Core i9-7920X - 91 vs 140 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-7920X doesn't have integrated graphics
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra+
Buy for CA$600.75 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 18063 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 5th, 2017
FPS
168
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.9/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$318.88
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for CA$318.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 18063 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra+
Desktop • Sep 10th, 2017
Desktop • Oct 5th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-7920X | vs | Intel Core i3-8350K |
---|---|---|
Sep 10th, 2017 | Release Date | Oct 5th, 2017 |
Core i9 | Collection | Core i3 |
Skylake | Codename | Coffee Lake |
Intel Socket 2066 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
12 | Cores | 4 |
24 | Threads | 4 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
4.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
140 W | TDP | 91 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 40.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |