Buy on Amazon
CA$600.75
In Stock
Availability
Availability
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $329
Availability
MSRP in USD: $329
Key Differences
In short — Core i9-7920X outperforms the cheaper Ryzen 7 2700X on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Ryzen 7 2700X is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-7920X is 221 days older than the cheaper Ryzen 7 2700X.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-7920X
- Performs up to 2% better in World of Warcraft than Ryzen 7 2700X - 182 vs 179 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 7 2700X - 24 vs 16 threads
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 7 2700X
- Up to 38% cheaper than Core i9-7920X - CA$375.0 vs CA$600.75
- Up to 37% better value when playing World of Warcraft than Core i9-7920X - CA$2.09 vs CA$3.3 per FPS
- Consumes up to 25% less energy than Intel Core i9-7920X - 105 vs 140 Watts
World of Warcraft
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Core i9-7920X
Desktop • Sep 10th, 2017
FPS
182
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$3.3/FPS
63%
Price, CA$
CA$600.75
62%
FPS Winner
Intel Core i9-7920X X-Series Processor 12 Cores up to 4.3 GHz Turbo Unlocked LGA2066 X299 Series 140W (Tray)
Buy for CA$600.75 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 17914 minutes ago
Ryzen 7 2700X
Desktop • Apr 19th, 2018
FPS
179
98%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$2.09/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$375
100%
Value Winner
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X Processor with Wraith Prism LED Cooler - YD270XBGAFBOX
Buy for CA$375 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 17914 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Core i9-7920X
Desktop • Sep 10th, 2017
Ryzen 7 2700X
Desktop • Apr 19th, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-7920X | vs | AMD Ryzen 7 2700X |
|---|---|---|
| Sep 10th, 2017 | Release Date | Apr 19th, 2018 |
| Core i9 | Collection | Ryzen 7 |
| Skylake | Codename | Pinnacle Ridge |
| Intel Socket 2066 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
12 | Cores | 8 |
24 | Threads | 16 |
| 2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
| 4.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
| 140 W | TDP | 105 W |
| 14 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
| 29.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | None |
| Yes | Overclockable | Yes |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
