Key Differences
In short — Core i9-14900K outperforms FX-6200 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-14900K is 4250 days newer than FX-6200.
Advantages of Core i9-14900K
- Performs up to 54% better in Minecraft than FX-6200 - 916 vs 594 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-6200 - 32 vs 6 threads
Minecraft
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Core i9-14900K
Desktop • Oct 17th, 2023
FX-6200
Desktop • Feb 27th, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i9-14900K | vs | FX-6200 |
|---|---|---|
Oct 17th, 2023 | Release Date | Feb 27th, 2012 |
| Core i9 | Collection | FX |
| Raptor Lake | Codename | Zambezi |
| Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
24 | Cores | 3 |
32 | Threads | 6 |
| 3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
6.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.1 GHz |
| Not Available | TDP | 125 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
32.0x | Multiplier | 19.0x |
| UHD Graphics 770 | Integrated Graphics | On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) |
| Yes | Overclockable | Yes |
