Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 7 3700X outperforms FX-6200 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 7 3700X is 2687 days newer than FX-6200.
Advantages of FX-6200
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 7 3700X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Ryzen 7 3700X
- Performs up to 12% better in F1 22 than FX-6200 - 280 vs 250 FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than AMD FX-6200 - 65 vs 125 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-6200 - 16 vs 6 threads
F1 22
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
FPS
280
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.69/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$193.71
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for CA$193.71 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 63 minutes ago
Trending Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Feb 27th, 2012
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
FX-6200 | vs | Ryzen 7 3700X |
---|---|---|
Feb 27th, 2012 | Release Date | Jul 7th, 2019 |
FX | Collection | Ryzen 7 |
Zambezi | Codename | Matisse |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
3 | Cores | 8 |
6 | Threads | 16 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
4.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 65 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
19.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |