Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 7950X outperforms FX-6200 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 9 7950X is 3865 days newer than FX-6200.
Advantages of FX-6200
- Consumes up to 26% less energy than AMD Ryzen 9 7950X - 125 vs 170 Watts
Advantages of Ryzen 9 7950X
- Performs up to 42% better in Lost Ark than FX-6200 - 313 vs 221 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-6200 - 32 vs 6 threads
Lost Ark
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Trending Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
FX-6200
Desktop • Feb 27th, 2012
Ryzen 9 7950X
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
FX-6200 | vs | Ryzen 9 7950X |
|---|---|---|
| Feb 27th, 2012 | Release Date | Sep 27th, 2022 |
| FX | Collection | Ryzen 9 |
| Zambezi | Codename | Raphael |
| AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | AMD Socket AM5 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 3 | Cores | 16 |
| 6 | Threads | 32 |
| 3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.5 GHz |
| 4.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.7 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 170 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 5 nm |
| 19.0x | Multiplier | 45.0x |
| On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Graphics |
| Yes | Overclockable | Yes |
