Key Differences
In short — Core i5-12400 outperforms FX-6200 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-12400 is 3599 days newer than FX-6200.
Advantages of Core i5-12400
- Performs up to 15% better in PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds than FX-6200 - 313 vs 273 FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than AMD FX-6200 - 65 vs 125 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-6200 - 12 vs 6 threads
PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Trending Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
FX-6200
Desktop • Feb 27th, 2012
Core i5-12400
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
FX-6200 | vs | Core i5-12400 |
|---|---|---|
| Feb 27th, 2012 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2022 |
| FX | Collection | Core i5 |
| Zambezi | Codename | Alder Lake |
| AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 3 | Cores | 6 |
| 6 | Threads | 12 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
| 4.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
| 125 W | TDP | 65 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
| 19.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
| On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 730 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |
