Key Differences
In short — Core i9-14900HX outperforms Core i9-10900F on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-14900HX is 1348 days newer than Core i9-10900F.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-14900HX
- Performs up to 25% better in Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege than Core i9-10900F - 742 vs 592 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i9-10900F - 32 vs 20 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-10900F doesn't have integrated graphics
Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
592
79%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.56/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$329.49
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$329.49 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 1022 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Mobile • Jan 8th, 2024
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-14900HX | vs | Intel Core i9-10900F |
---|---|---|
Jan 8th, 2024 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Core i9 | Collection | Core i9 |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel BGA 1964 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
24 | Cores | 10 |
32 | Threads | 20 |
2.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
5.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
Not Available | TDP | 65 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
22.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
UHD Graphics 770 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |